Associate, Department of Government, Harvard University
April 22, 2022
12:00pm - 1:00pm
RSVP Required
The Dissertation Workshop is a graduate educational seminar open to graduate students and their advisors. Spring workshops will be held in-person and are only open to Harvard and MIT affiliates who are on a regular University COVID-19 testing cadence. The Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies (CES) invites graduate students who are interested in presenting their research or to RSVP for this workshop to contact CES Dissertation Workshop Coordinator Hansong Li.
About
Eric Fabri is a BAEF postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University. He wrote a Ph.D. on the justification of private property and democratic theory at the Université Libre de Bruxelles and now works on the right to give, bequest, and inherit property. He also works on democratic theory with a continental perspective. He has co-edited a book on the political philosophy of Castoriadis and authored several articles on Locke’s theory of appropriation, property-owning democracy, the history of property rights, or utopian socialism.
In this workshop, Fabri will discuss a paper that binds together two complementary
and yet distinct questions: “Why should we prefer democracy to non-democratic
forms of political organization?”; and “What instantiation of the democratic
ideal (radical, indirect, deliberative, representative, participative
democracy, etc.) better realizes the normative reasons justifying the
normativity of the democratic ideal?”
Fabri will first try to identify what
principles lie at the heart of the democratic project and make it normatively
superior to other forms of political organization. To do so, he will build on
Cornelius Castoriadis’ incredibly fruitful – and yet widely ignored - social
ontology. After a brief presentation of this ontology, he will recall Castoriadis’
distinction between autonomy and heteronomy to identify the origin of the normativity
we associate with democratic regimes. Particular attention will be paid to a)
the ontological stakes of this argument, b) how it differs from classical
liberal arguments, and c) the way in which the democratic principle requires
an equal capacity for each individual to adopt an autonomous relation to the
laws and norms organizing their life in society.